• P63m to quench Molepolole thirstJune 4, 2025
    P63 million budgeted for water infrastructure development Water Ministry PS upbeat on the project success BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw RelatedPosts P63m to quench Molepolole thirst Boko to chop ‘deadwood’ ‘Give us our land back’- Saleshando After decades of enduring dry… Read more: P63m to quench Molepolole thirst
  • Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billionJune 3, 2025
    2024 growth driven by Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia Interest Income grew to P3.9 billion, double digit growth Operating income up 26% to reach P2.88 billion   BAKANG TIRO RelatedPosts Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billion Boko to chop ‘deadwood’ ‘Raise capital… Read more: Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billion
  • Boko to chop ‘deadwood’June 3, 2025
    Singles out ailing BMC, BAMB, BR & Air Botswana Orders BMC, BAMB to pay farmers within five days MPs call for sacking of CEOs appointed by BDP govt BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw RelatedPosts P63m to quench Molepolole thirst Letshego deposits… Read more: Boko to chop ‘deadwood’
  • Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruptionJune 2, 2025
    Botswana is in the storm of procurement corruption that has been left unattended for the longest time. Yet it appears it is difficult if not impossible to craft long-lasting solutions to as far as possible, cure procurement corruption because… Read more: Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruption
  • ‘Raise capital through BSE’June 2, 2025
    • BSE CEO implores CEEP beneficiaries • BSE, Debswana, Stanbic partner to unlock growth BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw Beneficiaries of Debswana Diamond Company Citizen Economic Empowerment Programme (CEEP)have been encouraged to raise capital in the Botswana Stock Exchange (BSE). This… Read more: ‘Raise capital through BSE’
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Analysis & Opinions
  • Vacancies & Tenders
  • Login
  • Register
Thursday, June 5, 2025
17 °c
Gaborone
21 ° Tue
22 ° Wed
24 ° Thu
26 ° Fri
The Patriot On Sunday
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Analysis & Opinions
  • Vacancies & Tenders
No Result
View All Result
Cart / $0.00

No products in the cart.

  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Analysis & Opinions
  • Vacancies & Tenders
No Result
View All Result
The Patriot On Sunday
No Result
View All Result
Home Analysis & Opinions

Constitution Bill 2024 is epitome of Judicial crisis

patriot by patriot
March 20, 2024
in Analysis & Opinions
235
0
President Masisi and Morwaeng

President Masisi and Morwaeng

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
ShareShareShare

Adam Phetlhe

A Bill called the Constitution (Amendment) Bill No 4 of 2024 appears in the Extraordinary Government Gazette and is set to be presented to the National Assembly. The Gazette says ‘The object of the Bill is to amend the Constitution of the Republic of Botswana following the approval by Government of the Recommendations of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Review of the Constitution of Botswana as agreed to and varied by Government Paper No 1 of 2023.’ To start with, the said Presidential Commission of Inquiry has been roundly criticised by some of Botswana’s finest Constitutional law scholars as a sham. By implication therefore, its outcome will be a sham as well. Law scholars in President Masisi’s cabinet know this is a sham of a Constitution meant to satisfy his preferences.  History will judge them very harshly for doing such a tragic disservice to Batswana. By invoking the Presidential Commission of Inquiry instrument, the President and those close to him sought to have a complete grip on what goes in the sham Constitution and what not. That is why during the so-called consultations with Batswana at Kgotla meetings, the President and the Minister in his office Hon Kabo Morwaeng, made it clear to those who cared to listen that they were against the direct election of the President contrary to what many Batswana had advocated for.  The Commissioners of the Constitutional Review Commission set the ball rolling by rejecting the direct election of the President proposal. One wonders whether we will have a referendum on the direct election of the President. But given how the sham was conceptualised, it is safe to say such is far-fetched.

RelatedPosts

Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruption

BCP should not reject forming a coalition

The sham that was BNFWL elective congress

In this conversation, I will be specifically discussing parts of the Bill with respect to the judiciary particularly with the appointments of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal. One would have expected a progressive approach to judiciary matters will be uppermost in the minds of the powers that be to meaningfully reform legislation on the judiciary. Instead, the status quo remains firmly in place given the how the Bill is drafted. The judiciary has been in the spotlight from various quarters notably the Law Society of Botswana (LSB) in the manner judges at the High Court and Court of Appeal are appointed. There has also been questions around the composition of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). The strong argument here is that 98% of the JSC is made up of individuals directly appointed by the President. Whatever spin anyone attempts to employ in order to                       discredit this view, it should be fair to suggest some members of the JSC directly appointed by the President owe their allegiance to him. The President wields so much power and authority over all the organs of the State and it is unimaginable any of the functionaries directly appointed by him would want to cross his path for their survival on the job and career prospects. So what does the Bill say about the foregoing?

Cosmetic amendment to the appointment of Chief Justice and President of COA

Section 28 (a) of the Bill provides that the ‘President shall, prior to the appointment, submit three nominees for the position of Chief Justice or President of the Court of Appeal to the Judicial Committee’ and (b) ‘The Judicial Committee shall assess and interview the three nominees under paragraph (a) and thereafter recommend two nominees to the President, one of which shall be appointed Chief Justice or President of the Court of Appeal, as the case may be’. The Judicial Committee shall be made up of five individuals solely and directly appointed by the President and will for all intents and purposes of this committee, render the Judicial Service Commission obsolete. But here is the thing: How will the President collect names of the nominees for the position of Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal? Why shouldn’t I assume the nominees will be those in the President’s corner? Why don’t applications for these positions be publicly advertised such that those who feel they have what it takes apply? All in all, the needle has not moved to render the appointments of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal fundamentally different from the sham that currently obtains.

Under the Memorandum part of the Bill at Clause 2 (o) and with respect to the President submitting ‘three nominees for the position of Chief Justice or President of the Court of Appeal’, it says ‘….This ensures transparency and credibility in the appointment of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal’. Laughable if you asked me. It cannot be overemphasised that transparency and credibility are the cornerstones of any appointment process. This unavoidably should be the case with appointment of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal but not in the manner suggested in the Constitution (Amendment) Bill No 4 of 2024. The process is tainted from the minute the President submits three nominees for the appointment of the most senior judges being the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal. In effect, it means two of the nominees submitted by the President will either be the Chief Justice or the President of the Court of Appeal…his preferred candidates for reasons only known to him. These will be the President’s man or woman specifically it will be justifiably argued, appointed to ‘protect’ him in whatever way possible.

On one hand and in a paper titled ‘Transparency and Accountability in the judicial appointment process’  by the Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Appeal L.T.C Harms, he says ‘According to legend Minister of Justice in the 1930s noted sardonically that judges, who have been appointed for political reasons, quite soon believe they have been on merit. In this simple anecdote lies the germ of issue of transparency and accountability in the judicial appointment process. Judges prefer to believe that they have been appointed on merit; the public does not believe they are but prefers they should be; politicians have their own view-they tend to prefer judges who will act predictably especially when they are no longer in power’. On the other, Due Process of Law Foundation lists the following as the minimum principles that should govern selection processes by first observing that ‘….It is therefore critical that only the most qualified candidates are appointed to the highest courts. This can only be ensured through a transparent selection process that is based on the merits of the candidates, rather than on their association or sympathy with the government in office or powerful special interests’. The minimum principles are that ‘the entities responsible for shortlisting the candidates must be autonomous; the appointment process, as well as the responsibilities of all actors engaged in the process, must be clearly established; the selection bodies must offer opportunities to different sectors of society to provide input on the candidates which should be investigated; public hearings must be held with candidates to assess their qualifications’. The mere fact that the President will submit three nominees to his personally appointed Judicial Committee that will interview and recommend them to him while their origins in terms of how the President nominated them is shrouded in secrecy fails to be in sync with the foregoing. 

It is clear from the way the Constitution (Amendment) Bill No 4 of 2024 is drafted that the President will continue to have a firm grip on the appointment of the Chief Justice and the Court of Appeal as has been the case prior the said amendment. Nothing has changed.  It will not be unfair to propose the Commissioners solely appointed by the President with clear terms of reference from him to ‘review’ the Constitution have wholesomely delivered his wishes. What is left is for his Members of Parliament to rubberstamp the sham of the Bill for him to sign it into law. I am prepared to be persuaded otherwise as always. Judge for Yourself!adamphetlhe08@gmail.com

Related

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

We are hiring: WILDERNESS

Next Post

MASISI’s ENDLESS LOVE

Related Posts

Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruption
Analysis & Opinions

Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruption

June 2, 2025
BCP should not reject forming a coalition
Analysis & Opinions

BCP should not reject forming a coalition

May 26, 2025
The sham that was BNFWL elective congress
Analysis & Opinions

The sham that was BNFWL elective congress

May 13, 2025
Batswana (66%) favour direct election of President
Analysis & Opinions

Batswana (66%) favour direct election of President

May 5, 2025
Khama in crosshairs of BCL inquiry
Analysis & Opinions

Khama in crosshairs of BCL inquiry

April 29, 2025
Listen to the doctors!
Analysis & Opinions

Listen to the doctors!

April 28, 2025
Next Post
MASISI’s ENDLESS LOVE

MASISI’s ENDLESS LOVE

  • P63m to quench Molepolole thirstJune 4, 2025
    P63 million budgeted for water infrastructure development Water Ministry PS upbeat on the project success BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw RelatedPosts P63m to quench Molepolole thirst Boko to chop ‘deadwood’ ‘Give us our land back’- Saleshando After decades of enduring dry… Read more: P63m to quench Molepolole thirst
  • Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billionJune 3, 2025
    2024 growth driven by Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia Interest Income grew to P3.9 billion, double digit growth Operating income up 26% to reach P2.88 billion   BAKANG TIRO RelatedPosts Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billion Boko to chop ‘deadwood’ ‘Raise capital… Read more: Letshego deposits hit P2.1 billion
  • Boko to chop ‘deadwood’June 3, 2025
    Singles out ailing BMC, BAMB, BR & Air Botswana Orders BMC, BAMB to pay farmers within five days MPs call for sacking of CEOs appointed by BDP govt BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw RelatedPosts P63m to quench Molepolole thirst Letshego deposits… Read more: Boko to chop ‘deadwood’
  • Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruptionJune 2, 2025
    Botswana is in the storm of procurement corruption that has been left unattended for the longest time. Yet it appears it is difficult if not impossible to craft long-lasting solutions to as far as possible, cure procurement corruption because… Read more: Mr President, direct appointment is not a panacea for corruption
  • ‘Raise capital through BSE’June 2, 2025
    • BSE CEO implores CEEP beneficiaries • BSE, Debswana, Stanbic partner to unlock growth BAKANG TIRO editors@thepatriot.co.bw Beneficiaries of Debswana Diamond Company Citizen Economic Empowerment Programme (CEEP)have been encouraged to raise capital in the Botswana Stock Exchange (BSE). This… Read more: ‘Raise capital through BSE’
The Patriot On Sunday

© 2024 Copyright The Patriot On Sunday - Inspired by Search Mart.

Navigate Site

  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Analysis & Opinions
  • Vacancies & Tenders

© 2024 Copyright The Patriot On Sunday - Inspired by Search Mart.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?